Subjects Bacterial structural biology Cellular microbiology Circadian rhythms. Access through your institution. Buy or subscribe. Change institution. Rent or Buy article Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube. References 1 Tseng, R. Authors Ashley York View author publications. Rights and permissions Reprints and Permissions. About this article. Cite this article York, A. Copy to clipboard. Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author.
Show results from All journals This journal. New studies are revealing some surprises about the molecular mechanisms that underlie these principles and about the variety of biological functions they may control. In most organisms studied so far, the generation of circadian rhythms seems to rely on self-regulating negative feedback loops in each cell—but these loops are different from those that keep body temperature or mineral content at a constant level.
These proteins then feed back to inhibit their own production. Normally, this entire process would probably take only a few minutes. But the clock builds in lengthy delays—during which the clock proteins accumulate or degrade to certain levels—to ensure that the total cycle takes about 24 hours. At least one gene or protein in the oscillating loop must interact with photo-receptors that relay light information so the biological clock can become entrained to local time. These molecular interactions account for the three fundamental characteristics of all circadian clocks: they have naturally running rhythms of close to 24 hours; they can be reset by environmental stimuli to run at exactly 24 hours; and they are temperature compensated they do not change their speeds just because the climate becomes cooler or warmer.
Instead, many organisms seem to have multiple interconnected feedback loops, creating a network of oscillating gene and protein regulation. Even these more complicated clock models show remarkable similarities among organisms. Even among animals that share many of the same circadian genes, some of these genes have been co-opted for different functions in different species. For example, the Drosophila clock gene period —the first clock gene discovered in any organism—has three homologs in the mouse, two of which appear to be classic clock genes as well.
Another negatively regulated clock gene in the fly, called timeless , is found in the mouse but may not be a part of the clock. Also, the protein cryptochrome, which is the major photoreceptor for fly circadian clock entrainment, is very likely not a photoreceptor at all in mammals but rather a key molecular component of the core feedback loop itself. Plants probably contain somewhat similar negative feedback loops, although the genes they use are completely different from those found in animals.
Plant clocks probably have more total components and more redundant components than the clocks of animals, Loros says. Studies in Neurospora crassa , the filamentous fungus that appears on stale bread and overripe fruit, have helped to reveal circadian properties common to all organisms, such as negative feedback and light entrainment.
As in animals and plants, the Neurospora clock consists of an autoregulatory negative feedback transcription loop, with two transcription factors driving expression of a clock gene called frequency , which, after a delay, inhibits its own transcription. One of the clock's driving transcription factors is also a photoreceptor. Mutations in any of these core circadian genes can alter the period, entrainment, or temperature compensation of the Neurospora clock. However, fungal strains that lack functional frequency feedback loops still retain rhythms in many processes, including spore generation, gene expression, and enzyme activity, which hints that there must be other oscillators controlling those processes.
There is excellent evidence for two entirely separate circadian oscillators in the single-celled marine dinoflagellate Gonyaulax polyedra , says plant geneticist C.
Robertson McClung of Dartmouth. Each feedback loop seems to control different aspects of metabolism and behavior and responds differently to environmental signals.
There are also accumulating data that multiple clocks may exist in plants, McClung says, although it's not clear whether the oscillators are likely to be in the same cells or divided into different types of cells.
Animals also contain multiple circadian oscillators, but there's no evidence that more than one oscillator resides in the same cell. Instead, they are relegated to different tissues. Before that, it was widely believed that mammalian circadian rhythms were a property of a few cells in the brain—specifically, of a tiny paired cluster of neurons in the hypothalamus called the suprachiasmatic nucleus SCN.
There was good evidence that the SCN was important for the mammalian clock: it receives direct light input from the retina, and removing the SCN destroys all behavioral and endocrine rhythms in a mammal.
In an experiment that clinched the SCN's importance in mammalian circadian rhythms, neurobiologist Michael Menaker, of the University of Virginia, and his colleagues transplanted SCNs from hamsters with abnormally short circadian periods into hamsters whose SCNs had been removed.
The transplant recipients immediately adopted the circadian cycles of the mutant SCNs. However, later experiments that examined molecular rhythms in gene expression in peripheral tissues, rather than organism-wide behavioral rhythms, found that these oscillations can persist in mammals without SCNs. Researchers at the University of Geneva also showed that a cell line of fibroblasts that had been in culture for 30 years could be induced to show hour rhythms of gene expression.
What didn't persist in the absence of an animal's SCN was the synchrony of rhythms between cells and tissues. What these systemic signals are, however, is still a mystery. A centralized pacemaker is most likely necessary in mammals, because the retina is the only known way that light reaches the molecular clock. Mammals are unique in this respect; birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and insects all have photoreceptive cells outside of their eyes.
Some scientists have suggested that the nocturnal ancestry of mammals may have caused them to lose the extraocular photoreceptors and associated pacemakers that are found in other vertebrates, he says. Many birds, for example, have lightweight, translucent skulls that allow light to penetrate into the brain, where it is processed by many different photoreceptors.
This entrainment information can therefore feed not only into the retina and the SCN but also into the pineal gland inside the brain. The retina, pineal, and SCN are considered to be separate circadian pacemakers in birds and reptiles, but the importance of each pacemaker to the total circadian system differs widely among even closely related species. The insect network of circadian oscillators functions somewhat differently than that of vertebrates.
Neurons in the Drosophila brain known as the lateral neurons are somewhat analagous to the mammalian SCN, in that normal fly locomotor rhythms disappear if the lateral neurons are destroyed. However, peripheral oscillators in Drosophila , which are present in their wings, legs, mouth, antennae, and probably elsewhere, are a step more independent than peripheral oscillators in mammals, as they entrain to light cues directly, with no input from the brain or the eyes.
Cryptochrome, which was first identified as a blue-light photoreceptor in plants, is almost certainly the major photoreceptor involved in Drosophila light entrainment, although visual photoreceptors provide some input as well. Peripheral oscillators in the weed Arabidopsis thaliana can also be entrained directly by light, through at least seven different photoreceptors, and probably more.
Two are blue-light cryptochromes and five are phytochromes, which respond best to red or far-red light. There are other candidate photoreceptors in Arabidopsis that look as if they feed into circadian pathways as well, says McClung. Cancer is an extreme result of the disruption of circadian rhythms.
Normally when rhythms are not synced, it can lead to problems involving sleep disorders, metabolic issues, psychiatric disorders, weight gain, and slower thinking. Some studies have also connected the malfunctioning of the circadian rhythm to Alzheimers. When the circadian rhythm is not working properly, mice have been shown to undergo behavioral and physical changes, become more impulsive, and exhibit changes in the medial prefrontal cortex, which is the part of the brain that controls executive function.
It should be noted that minor cases of circadian rhythm disruption can be fixed. For example, for sleep troubles, one can dim the lights a bit before bed in order to prevent the brain from cutting off melatonin supply, which can help someone sleep. What did you learn? What is the main peptide responsible for regulating circadian rhythms? Neuromedin S is responsible for the regulation of circadian rhythms, as it serves as a cellular pacemaker.
It is secreted by SCN neurons, and in turn activates the neurons around it and induces phase shifts for neurons associated with brain function and movement.
How is the dysfunction of circadian rhythms related to cancer? These bright lights trick the brain into thinking there is sunlight, and so the brain cuts off the melatonin supply because people are usually awake during the day.
However, melatonin protects against extensive DNA damage, and when the supply is consistently cut off by all the bright lights someone may be surrounded by, it is possible that DNA will undergo damage.
Cancer is when cells with extensive DNA mutations continue to divide at a rapid pace. Because melatonin is not protecting the DNA from mutation, the DNA could continue to mutate and the end result would be cancerous cells. Joanne Lee. Recent Posts See All.
0コメント